Leadership Development Dissertation Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 10500 words

Leadership Development - Dissertation modellingChapter 1Introduction1.1. Purpose of the studyLeadership organic evolution needs organization autobuss, Whilst in the past, as our look into shows, most observers and experts had tended to view Leadership, and leadership development, as an independent area of consideration within the unified structure, over the past two decades it has been increasingly seen to be an integral part of the total organization caution system itself. Consequently, research often links the two areas together. There are an abundance of studies and research documents affirm this fact. These include that of Zaleznick (1977), who defined the leader as the person who brings about change, with the manager being the controller of those changes. Kotter (1990, p. 103) communicate the view that management is about coping with complexity. Leadership, by contrast is about coping with change. The take aim of this report is to examine the validity of the hypothesis. 1.2. Specific ObjectiveThis central objective of this report is to examine the go-ahead hypothesis in order to arrive at a conclusion as to its validity and importance. 1.3. DelimitationsFor the train of this report, we slang limited our study to the subject as it relates to a commercial organization, in preference to organizations in the public or charitable sector, although in reality the same principles would form the basis for measuring the sure-fire future growth pattern for all of these structures. 1.4. SignificanceOur study covers the current thinking and research in respect of the leadership developments and its application in the corporate environment, including an analysis its importance and relevance. At the same time, we have reviewed and studied the research available regarding the... The literature will reveal how changes have occurred between these three elements, with the sign concept of management, which has been around since the early part of last century, is seen as the driving force behind the business. posterior management was to lose its significance, giving way to the relatively new concept of leadership, with this taking a expulsion in the thoughts of corporations and researchers alike. We will see how the views of business analysts and researchers for a period separated leadership and leadership development from management and conducted studies of these in these areas as almost diverse entities, emphasizing the differences between the two. For example, the School of Engineering and Electronics at the University of Edinburgh (1997), in their study on the subject, concluded that Managing and leading are two different ways of organizing people. The manager uses a formal, rational method whilst the leader uses passion and stirs emotions.Dr. Paul Harborne (2001) and Stormy Friday (2002) within their respective written document also emphasized differences that exist between these conceptions, stressing the importance that this represe nted in business terms. However, more research has moved away from these theories, suggesting now that in fact, there is an interrelationship between the leadership and management, and that a matched and successful business is best achieved in an environment where leadership development and the organizations managers work in partnership.